Fifty-seven

| 7 Comments

That's the number of times the term "cone of silence" has been used in television coverage since Saturday's Saddleback interviews, per the transcript database TVEyes.

For those of you who've missed out on the story that introduces this delightfully moronic term into our political vernacular, "cone of silence" refers to the Twenty One-esque isolation chamber (okay, a room with no TV or audio—which is, of course, the same thing) that Rick Warren had set up at Saddleback to keep John McCain from hearing the questions he asked Barack Obama—the same ones McCain would have to answer—in advance of his own interview. “I'm going to ask identical questions to each of these candidates, so you can compare apples to apples," Warren told his audience. "Now, Senator Obama is going to go first. We flipped a coin, and we have safely placed Senator McCain in a cone of silence.”

Except: not cone of silence! Bus of silence! Or, rather, Straight Talk Express of Silence! Seems McCain was en route to the megachurch, rather than sequestered away in Warren's C-O-S, while Obama was giving his interview. Which, you know—scandal. So, everyone from CNN to the NYT to Politico to the Huffington Post to the Orange County Register to the cable channels has been following the story—and thus generally referring to McCain's disputed "cone of silence" without, alas, irony.

The Cone of Silence's zenith as a phrase, though, had to have come yesterday, during the course of none other than Meet the Press. Here's Andrea Mitchell discussing the "allegations" on MTP's hallowed political ground, emphasis mine:

The Obama people must feel that he didn't do quite as well as they might have wanted to in that context, because that—what they're putting out privately is that McCain may not have been in the cone of silence and may have had some ability to overhear what the questions were to Obama....He seemed so well-prepared.

Wow, an appearance on MTP! For C-O-S, that's quite a C-O-U-P. Now, it should be noted that the McCain campaign insists the candidate didn't hear Warren's questions in advance. “The insinuation from the Obama campaign that John McCain, a former prisoner of war, cheated is outrageous,” said McCain spokesperson Nicole Wallace. But, still: for something meant to bring silence, Warren's cone has been making a lot of noise.

7 Comments

Why in the world is the "former prisoner of war" reference relevant? McCain and crew are getting as bad as 9/11 Giuliani for dropping that phrase randomly into sentences.

The question for Ms. Wallace should be, what possible bearing does John McCain's having been "a former prisoner of war" on this issue?

Maybe it's to remind us all that the good Senator doesn't like to bring up the fact that he was a prisoner of war...

Except that nary an opportunity goes by where McCain's sheeple do bring it up Pete ;)

References to Twenty One are not, I should think, the way to inspire integrity in a televised questioning process. *cough* Charles van Doren *cough*

For "integrity in", please read "confidence in the integrity of". (It's past my bedtime.)

Rick Warren told Larry King that McCain must have been telling the truth because he was with the Secret Service the whole time. Since when would the Secret Service have spoken to anyone about this matter one way or the other? They don't do that. Not that the less-than-razor-sharp Larry King bothered to ask. Who'll be the first reporter to turn over the Secret Service card?

Twenty One made the "isolation booth' famous. The "Cone of Silence" was made famous by Maxwell Smart in the Get Smart TV series. It was supposed to ensure a private conversation when in fact it prevented any conversation. Now that history is satisfied, the important questions are - Why did Rev. Warren say he was in 'the cone' when he wasn't? Has Senator McCain himself unequivocally denied that he was in any way briefed on the questions or Obama's answers?

Leave a comment

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on August 18, 2008 4:17 PM.

Skeptical Reporting 101 was the previous entry in this blog.

The Fun Will Come Out...Tomorrow? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.