On Hardball's pregame right now, a crowd of people--most of them, apparently, Hofstra students; almost all of them, judging from their cheers and jeers, Obama supporters--is gathered behind Chris Matthews as he chats with the Chicago Tribune's Jill Zuckman and The New York Times's Jeff Zeleny. Behind Matthews's head, a large sign, its black background and its orange and white lettering standing out among the sea of Obamian Red and Blue, is being propped up by an unknown advocate. The sign advertises Ed in '08, an attempt to make education reform a key issue in the presidential campaign. I've written about their efforts before, on Campaign Desk, and must sadly acknowledge that, however worthy their cause, and however noble their efforts toward achieving it, that cause has now been completely trumped by the economy. Chalk yet another loss up to the crisis.
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Categories
- Audio (8)
- Behind the News (1008)
- Blog Report (467)
- Campaign Desk (538)
- Cover Story (2)
- Currents (6)
- Darts and Laurels (7)
- Dispatch
- Dispatches from Iraq (10)
- Editor's Picks (47)
- Editorial (8)
- Essay (21)
- Events (6)
- Feature (34)
- First Person (2)
- Full Court Press (17)
- Language Corner (29)
- Lead Story (4)
- Magazine Report (116)
- News Meeting (13)
- On the Contrary (1)
- On the Job (7)
- Overload! (9)
- Page Views (5)
- Parting Thoughts (17)
- Politics (1404)
- Profile (5)
- Q and A (3)
- Regret the Error (17)
- Review (17)
- Second Read (3)
- Short Takes (3)
- Starting Thoughts (8)
- The Audit (552)
- The Kicker (1210)
- The News Business (1)
- The Observatory (77)
- The Research Report (7)
- The Water Cooler (162)
- Top Story (3)
- Transparency (12)
- Video (5)
- Voices in Time (11)
Monthly Archives
- February 2009 (123)
- January 2009 (305)
- December 2008 (267)
- November 2008 (296)
- October 2008 (388)
- September 2008 (459)
- August 2008 (299)
- July 2008 (151)
- June 2007 (5)
- May 2007 (69)
- April 2007 (40)
- March 2007 (56)
- February 2007 (46)
- January 2007 (60)
- December 2006 (37)
- November 2006 (71)
- October 2006 (74)
- September 2006 (70)
- August 2006 (77)
- July 2006 (54)
- June 2006 (72)
- May 2006 (70)
- April 2006 (62)
- March 2006 (74)
- February 2006 (68)
- January 2006 (63)
- December 2005 (65)
- November 2005 (83)
- October 2005 (95)
- September 2005 (93)
- August 2005 (69)
- July 2005 (67)
- June 2005 (87)
- May 2005 (76)
- April 2005 (66)
- March 2005 (74)
- February 2005 (63)
- January 2005 (65)
- December 2004 (61)
- November 2004 (78)
- October 2004 (97)
- September 2004 (98)
- August 2004 (83)
- July 2004 (102)
- June 2004 (90)
- May 2004 (78)
- April 2004 (102)
- March 2004 (121)
- February 2004 (113)
- January 2004 (68)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on October 15, 2008 7:03 PM.
IM'ing past each other was the previous entry in this blog.
Hollow Criticism from MarketWatch is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
I would not give up hope for education yet. That higher education is an important subject is proven by the recent responses of professors of economics, who turned out to be surprisingly responsive and "articulate" in this economic crisis. Instead of waiting to publish a few obscure articles months later, they got to work rapidly and distinguished themselves.
If only we could say the same for Linguistics professors, who remain mired in terminal trivia, best exemplified by the fatuous Language Log. As if English were not a huge international factitious business costing the world economy hundreds of billions of dollars a year, and more, if we added in opportunity costs.
The New York Times should establish a powerful international higher education section (The Australian provides something of a beginner's model), with well-organized comment, as at www.reddit.com and www.slashdot.org. Except for the Macquarie U. Schwartz blog, www.vc.mq.edu.au, most academic blogs are pathetic. Something that an international higher education section at NYT could help change. The traditional reporting mechanisms on higher education--Chronicle of etc.--would put you into a terminal bureaucratic sleep.
The mystery of education is that so few in America paid any attention to the stunning collapse of ETS Europe in its UK marking fiasco, so that the conclusions that should have been drawn about ETS and Kaplan in the U.S. did not get drawn.
If the U.S. simply made the COBUILD Intermediate English Grammar and English Grammar, and the Longman Advanced American Dictionary and Language Activator, official for all schools and first-year university English, while teaching texts to support the official books ("Great Expectations" is excellent for conditions called counterfactuals), within two years America would have the most integrated English teaching methods in the world.
Instead, we have pervasive parasitism. Azar "grammars." TOEFL. SAT. The best introduction to our ways in education is "The Art of Being a Parasite," not really about education, but really about education. Try looking at first-year composition courses.
CJR itself (an honest and interesting publication) has just had--search Dion--a blog entry that indicates how slovenly English teaching is in most Journalism schools. CJR should explore the implications of this story.